Have a child component on which a render is triggered.
This component delays its willUpdateProps and makes a rendering during the willUpdateProps
Before this commit, renderings of the child were inconsistent across
its parent's renderings.
After this commit, it works as expected.
Before this commit, when defining a getter in the env passed to useSubEnv,
the value was read, losing the definition of the property.
After this commit, declaring a getter in the env works as expected:
the property stays a getter.
Before this commit, when defining a getter in the env passed to the App,
the value was read, losing the definition of the property.
After this commit, declaring a getter in the env works as expected:
the property stays a getter.
Before this commit, class inheritance when using the onError hook was unclear nay wrong.
After this commit, error handlers are called from the bottom up in the inheritance hierarchy.
If a handler doesn't rethrow the error, the handling stops there and no other handler is called.
If a handler does rethrow, the handlers declared in a parent class are executed.
In the following situation: A parent of B, B parent of C, with an error
when C is mounted, caught by B and retriggering a rendering in B, then
the onMounted hook of A wasn't properly called. This commit fixes this
problem.
Before this commit, there were situations where the reference numbers
were not properly set, which caused the blocks generated to crash
because the algorithm could not get correct references.
When a parent and a child were rendered at the same time, it was
possible for the 2 renders to decrement the same fiber internal
counter, which meant that the render was stalled.
The slot inner working has been reworked. A prop "slots" is now passed
explicitely to the component. It looks like
{ slotName_1: slotInfo_1, ..., slotName_m: slotInfo_m }
with the objects slotInfo_i with mandatory keys "__render", "__ctx",
and optional key "__scope" and possibly others.
Here is how a slotInfo object can be created:
A slotInfo object is normally created by setting in a template something
like
<div>
<t t-set-slot="foo" t-set-scope="scope" param_1="var" param_2="3">
content
<t t-esc="scope.bool"/>
<t t-esc="scope.num"/>
</t>
</div>
and it will be used somewhere like
<div>
<t t-esc="props.slots.foo.param_1"/>
<t t-slot="foo" bool="other_var" num="5">
</div>
In the above example, the function "__render" produces the block dom
element for the content of the t-set-slot.
The context "__ctx" will have a key "scope" with value { bool: ..., num: 5 }
and "__scope" will be set to "scope".
This commit makes the reactivity system more fine grained and makes it
more eager to stop observing keys or objects when they are modified,
this results in fewer "false positive" notifications.
Before this commit, errors triggered at the level of the fiber (as opposed to at the level
of a component's rendering), were handled as the very top level of the rendering, that is,
in the scheduler.
This was wrong because components below in the rendering tree would not have a chance to handle their
children's or their own errors.
After this commit, error triggered in willPatch, onMounted and onPatched are correctly handled
at the closest component to where they were thrown.
Have a Child Compnent which has one component that succeeds and another
one that fails at its instanciation.
The Child component handles the Errors by rendering itself.
Before this commit, the error handling algorithm made impossible for the scheduler to finish.
This was because the current fiber was still counted as ongoing, when it was actually completed.
After this commit, this use case is handled correctly.
t-out automatically escaped content when it is a string not marked
with the `markup` function
t-out renders the raw content if it is a Block, or if it has been marked
with the `markup` funtion.
t-esc has been kept since it is safe and is optimized to render text nodes.
all t-raw calls are in fact the same as t-out.
The deletion of a key in an observed object did clear the observers of
that key but did not clear the atoms created (if any) when the key existed
(e.g. on the key value if it was trackable). This can lead to a growing
set of atoms that are useless but kept in memory if a lot of keys are
added/deleted. The same thing can happen if a key value is changed many
times and the values are trackable.
Here we fix the problem by
- keeping tracks of the objects that have been observed by an external call
to the method "atom" (we call them seeds).
- remove all observer atoms that are not seeds for observers of at least
one key deletion or key value change.
Note the fix is in some sense partial: a user could use the "atom" primitive
making the new system uncapable of avoiding a leak (see test "atom on an
object with a getter 3" where a getter is used in a weird way in an
observed object).
Géry Debongnie